Concert-goers new to
the classical scene are always asking, “when can I clap?” In
pondering an answer to this question, I came across some interesting
facts and trends on various websites of symphony orchestras and
record companies, and even some discrepancies as to the basis for the
tradition. One source claims that the idea of saving applause for
after the final movement of a piece is actually a pretty recent (only
the last 50 years or so) phenomenon, while another says that the
protocol is firmly rooted in the German tradition, dating back to
Mozart's time.
How you might react
at a concert should not be something to stress over. It's not your
fault that composers wrote works in such a way as to “fake you
out,” with false endings only a third of the way through a work.
The tendency worldwide is to favor between-movement applause,
especially after big endings where it is hard not to applaud, but not
as an obligation after every single movement, regardless of its level
of finality. After a movement that ends quietly, it is
preferred that there be no applause, as the silence between movements
here serves as a tension builder. When an entire work
ends quietly, it is extremely jarring when one or maybe two attendees
clap before the final note has even faded away. When
this happens, the applauders, or shouters of “Bravo,” become
performers, proving
to all that they know when
the work is over. (Or
perhaps that they are following along in a score to the work). There
are no awards for being the first person to clap; if there is any
doubt, it's ok to be a follower and not a leader; the
conductor will put down his baton and turn around and bow. I
feel safe in quoting Billy Joel here; “Leave a tender moment
alone.” Like most musicians, I cherish that span of silence that
lay between the final placid note and the first pair of clapping
hands. In any case, if someone's applause bothers you at a concert,
it is NOT ok to express your dismay by giving them the hairy eyeball.
Let's look at some
other questions that surface from time to time. I have used the
terms “movement,” “piece,” and “work” above, but never
the word “song.” To hear iTunes tell the story, everything that
has sound is a “song,” whether it is a 5-hour Wagner Opera, a
Bach cantata, or one of those little 20-second snippets of song on
the Beatles' Let It Be album
(like Dig
It). Sure, iTunes, whatever.
The concert hall reality is that classical composers write works
(think
“work of art”) or
pieces,
which may have several sections or movements.
They
may write song
cycles,
literally an album of songs, but that album
as a body
is referred to as a piece
or a work.
Confusion
happens when there are differing styles and tempi
within an individual movement. Prokofiev
did this a lot. It
can also happen when two movements are linked together. (Musicians
call this practice attacca,
Italian for “attached”). In
my first season here, maestro Kirk Trevor conducted Brahms 4th
Symphony with the final two movements linked very seamlessly, and
when the Thursday night performance was over, (thinking
the third movement was actually 16 minutes long),
no one clapped! He had to step off of the podium and bow to convince
the audience that there was not another movement forthcoming. The
Friday night show utilized a somewhat longer pause between the third
and fourth movements.
I
think
we can all agree that, applause or not, there is no worse interrupter
of a classical concert than a cell phone going off. We depend on the
audience to be sticklers for silencing their phones, and for not
answering
them (but
silencing them discreetly) if
they do ring. I
refer you to a scene in the 2000 Woody Allen film, Small
Time Crooks,
wherein Tracey Ullman answers a cellphone call in the middle of a
cello recital. It's a ridiculously funny social commentary, brought
off as only Woody can.
My
words here are by no means the gospel on this subject. Here are a
couple webpages whose content I found useful. NeoClassical is a blog by Holly Mulcahy, concertmaster of the
Chattanooga Symphony. I especially liked that she had advice for experienced
concert-goers and newbies alike, with some special guidelines for
conductors. And this Colorado Public Radio story gives some
historical background to the differing customs regarding this issue.
1 comment:
While I certainly don't want to come off as stuffy or pretentious, I will say now that I tend to view a classical piece as a whole entity and not as an amalgamation of assorted tunes. Because movements in a piece tend to be musically interconnected, I don't think that inter-movement applause is appropriate, even if the movement in question ends fortissimo and on a (repeated) perfect cadence. Applause after a movement (unless the said movement is the ultimate one) also comes before the (often musically-connected) following movement and is therefore a disturbance of the whole piece's progression. I feel that classical audiences today tend to be more informed about the music than in years past (when they would eat and drink during the concert). By the same token, I suppose it should be appropriate to applaud after a good (and forte) cadenza (such as that played by the harpsichord in the first movement of Bach's Brandenburg Concerto No. 5 in D). Perhaps the "recognition applause" that is ubiquitous in nearly all other forms of music should be appropriate as well, especially when the piece being played is well-known? After all, the above instances of spontaneous outbursts are historically well-documented; Mozart frequently received "recognition applause," and Bulow very often received applause after the opening cadenza in Beethoven's Emperor Concerto. Again, I'm not trying to come off as snobby; I'm certainly not a working classical musician. However, I am a very poor amateur violist and I listen to orchestral music fairly often; therefore, I hope that my stance on applause (which is undoubtedly shared by others) may prompt healthy discussion. If there's one thing we can agree on, it's that cell phones are certainly undesirably intrusive during a concert!
Post a Comment